On December 24, an MiG-21 aircraft of the Indian Air Force crashed in the western state of Rajasthan during a training exercise, leaving one pilot dead.
The incident was the latest in a series of crashes in the year 2021 — one of the deadliest for Indian military aviation.
The crash also came weeks after the country’s first chief of defense staff, General Bipin Rawat, was killed in a helicopter crash.
While the cause of the crash involving the general is nevertheless being determined, the December 24 accident saw the fifth MiG-21 jet go down in 2021.
The air disaster has once again brought the issue of out of use military equipment into focus and triggered a discussion about Indian military modernization.
How is the time of action going?
Defense experts say that the changing geopolitical situation and the security scenery of the Indian subcontinent have prompted the Indian government to accelerate military modernization.
“Since last year, we have seen this sudden jump in modernization because of tensions with China and the current Ladakh standoff and, of course, the continued engagement with Pakistan,” Amrita Jash, an assistant professor at the Department of Geopolitics and International Relations, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, told DW.
India’s first chief of defense staff, General Bipin Rawat, was recently killed in a helicopter crash
Bharat Karnad, a national security expert and emeritus professor at the Center for Policy Research, said that the modernization program was not well thought-out.
“Military modernization in India has always been a helter-skelter course of action, which only vaguely conforms to prospective plans drawn up by the concerned sets’ directorates,” he told DW.
What are the challenges?
Experts say that one of the biggest challenges confronting India’s military modernization is the defense budget. In 2020, India’s defense budget stood at around $68 billion (€60 billion), while that of China amounted to about $178 billion.
“Modernization is ultimately a function of the financial resources made obtainable to the military,” Karnad stressed.
“The one singular problem in India’s case is that the payroll expenditure for a manpower-intensive Indian army, in particular, is going by the roof,” he said.
“Consider this: the army took up fully 56% of the 2020-2021 budget or $38 billion, of this only 18%, or approximately $7 billion, was allotted for capital expenditure, which is for the procurement of modern armaments and spares. $7 billion doesn’t buy much military modernization these days,” Karnad explained.
A meaningful reform towards modernization, backed by chief Minister Narendra Modi’s government, aims to integrate the capabilities of the army, the navy and the air force.
The current 17 single-service units are to come under five “theater commands” to establish a unified approach to deal with future conflicts.
Jash said the reform is vital to the modernization course of action.
“Modernization is not just about the weapons, the platforms, and the equipment, because now we are also talking about theaterziation of commands, bringing in all three elements,” she said.
“China has already moved into theaterization and India is nevertheless in the talks for theaterization. Right now, modernization should rule to theaterzation,” she noted.
In 2020, a report from the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG) on Siachen — the world’s highest battleground in the Himalayas — had highlighted a shortage of much needed military gear.
There have been several such reports of shortages and equipment becoming out of use in the last decade.
“Among old weapons platforms nevertheless in service, the most noticeable is the MiG-21 Bison in the Indian Airforce Fleet, which is being phased out,” Karnad said.
More focus on cyber warfare needed
Regarding the reasons why the aircraft is nevertheless in use, analysts say that because of the without of money for acquiring new jets, the aviation units of the army and the navy cannot all be modernized at once. Some say that authorities need to have clarity on what kind of jets India needs.
“Right now, our biggest problem is that we don’t have stealth aircraft. Secondly, we just got the Rafale [fighter aircraft], but the track record of MiG continues. On the one hand, we are talking about bringing in Rafale, and on the other, we are also seeing the devastating character of the MiGs. There needs to be a balance,” Jash said.
The Indian government has laid greater emphasis on producing and procuring military equipment locally, like this native aircraft carrier INS Vikrant
Furthermore, there needs to be increased focus on cyber and network centric warfare, experts stressed.
“Fatal shortcomings, as compared to the Chinese People’s Liberation Army, are probably in the spheres of cyber warfare and impenetrable strategic and battlefield communications systems, where the deficiencies are, if anything, widening,” Karnad said.
The way ahead?
India is currently one of the world’s top five arms importers. But Modi’s government has laid greater emphasis on producing and procuring weapons and military equipment locally.
“The recent purchases that India has made show a strategic shift in thought course of action. Now, we are very calculative in our procurement,” Jash said, pointing to last year’s acquisition of ultralight howitzer artillery guns from the United States.
She also finds the modernization of the Indian navy commendable, offering the example of the native aircraft carrier INS Vikrant, the planned carrier INS Vishal and the flagship, alternation Kiev-class aircraft carrier INS Vikramaditya.
“India is trying to balance the shortcomings out with indigenization of defense equipment. Be it INS Vishal or INS Vikramaditya, indigenization is the only response now along with balancing it out with the right kind of foreign arms,” said Jash.
Edited by: Srinivas Mazumdaru
Click: See details